New Legal AI Adoption & Impact Report Shows Legal AI Moving From Experimentation to Everyday Use
Survey of 250+ legal professionals tracks the rise of generative AI across litigation and investigations
by Casey Sullivan
Sometimes change comes bit by bit. At others, it seems to hit all at once. Legal technology has experienced both.
Today, Everlaw released its 2026 Legal AI Adoption and Impact Report, documenting the rapid evolution of generative AI in litigation and investigations work. Born as the Ediscovery Cloud Adoption Report, this annual industry survey first began as the industry was in the midst of a long, often gradual transition from on-premises ediscovery technology to the cloud. Year after year, it tracked that shift as cloud adoption grew, eventually becoming firmly established as the standard for modern ediscovery.
Today, the pace of change looks very different.
Generative AI has moved from experimentation to an everyday reality of legal work in just a few years. As cloud technology became established, the focus of this report evolved with it: from tracking the adoption of cloud-based ediscovery to examining the rapid adoption of AI across litigation and investigations.
The 2026 Legal AI Adoption & Impact Report reflects that shift. Completed in partnership with the Association of Certified E-Discovery Specialists and the International Legal Technology Association, the report draws on insights from more than 250 legal professionals. It looks not only at whether legal organizations are using generative AI, but at how that adoption is changing the way legal work gets done — from workflows and business models to governance, talent development, and the future of legal practice.
This year’s findings mark an important milestone. Today, 49% of legal professionals now actively use generative AI in their work, up by double digits from last year, and nearly half believe it will soon become standard across the practice of law.
That adoption is increasingly showing up in day-to-day practice. Nearly a quarter of respondents use generative AI multiple times per day, while the share of professionals reporting that they save five to 10 hours per week has more than doubled since last year.
And respondents are already beginning to push the technological frontier farther. As generative AI becomes part of everyday legal workflows, attention is shifting toward agentic AI: systems capable of coordinating more complex, multi-step work. That evolution raises questions that go well beyond technology, from how legal services are priced to how junior lawyers develop the skills and judgment they need to advance.
For legal organizations, the opportunity is not simply to adopt another generation of technology. It is to rethink how work gets done — and how lawyers can use these tools to spend more of their time on judgment, strategy, and the work where they provide the greatest value.
Six Highlights from the Report
1. Generative AI Becomes the New Standard
Generative AI is rapidly becoming part of mainstream legal practice. Just under half of respondents say they actively use it in their legal work, an increase of 12 percentage points from last year and 15 percentage points from 2024.
The shift is increasingly about more than isolated experiments. Legal organizations are beginning to integrate AI more broadly into departments, practice groups, and everyday workflows, suggesting that adoption is moving into a new phase.
2. Billing Practices Continue to Evolve
The legal industry has debated the future of the billable hour for decades. AI is adding new urgency to that conversation.
Half of respondents say generative AI has already changed conventional billing practices or expect it to do so within the next year. As AI enables some work to be completed more quickly, firms and clients are confronting a familiar question in a new context: how should legal value be measured and priced when time spent and value delivered are no longer as closely connected?
3. Increased AI Adoption Leads to Major Time Savings
This year’s report shows that AI adoption is translating into significant productivity gains for a substantial amount of respondents. The share of legal professionals saving five to 10 hours per week through generative AI has more than doubled from last year.
Put another way, for some professionals, AI is giving back the equivalent of a substantial part of the workweek. The question increasingly becomes what teams do with that time — whether it is redirected toward strategy, client service, deeper analysis, or other higher-value work.
4. Agentic AI Becomes the Next Frontier for Innovation
Even as generative AI becomes more established, legal organizations are already beginning to explore what comes next.
Nearly one-third of respondents say they are piloting multi-agent systems in which different AI agents coordinate across complex tasks — for example, with one conducting research, another synthesizing information, and another drafting an output.
Legal professionals also see particular potential for agents to bring structure to complex information. Forty-two percent identified creating case timelines from fragmented data as one of the areas where autonomous AI agents could provide the most value.
5. Widespread AI Implementation Meets an Undefined Playbook
The pace of adoption is also creating a governance challenge.
One-third of respondents say their organizations still do not have a formal policy governing the use of generative AI, even as nearly half report actively using the technology in their work.
There is also little consensus around disclosure. Nearly one-third say they disclose the use of generative AI to clients for all substantive legal work, including drafting, research, and analysis, while one-quarter say they do not.
Together, the findings suggest that many organizations are still developing the policies, norms, and governance structures needed to catch up with the way AI is already being used.
6. Professional Advancement Depends on AI Ability
AI proficiency is quickly becoming an important part of professional development in the legal sector. But the same technology that can make experienced lawyers more productive may also disrupt some of the traditional ways junior lawyers learn.
Understanding how to evaluate, audit, and verify AI output is increasingly viewed as an important professional skill. At the same time, nearly one-third of respondents worry that AI could create a foundational skills gap for early-career lawyers.
As AI takes on more of the routine work that has historically helped junior lawyers develop experience, firms will need to think differently about training, mentorship, evaluation, and how the next generation builds judgment.
If the shift to the cloud in the legal industry often felt like a long crawl, the shift to AI is undeniably a sprint. The highlights above capture only part of that story. The 2026 Legal AI Adoption & Impact Report includes many more insights into how AI is changing legal workflows, business models, governance, talent, and the future of practice.
Download the full report to explore the findings and see where legal AI adoption is headed next.
Casey Sullivan is an attorney and writer based out of San Francisco, where he leads Everlaw’s content team. His writing on ediscovery and litigation has been read by thousands and cited by federal courts. See more articles from this author.